Attorney General Opinions and Advisory Letters

Decision Information

Citations - New Mexico Appellate Reports
Borrowdale v. Board of County Comm'rs - cited by 45 documents
Gallegos v. Conroy - cited by 126 documents

Decision Content

Opinion No. 47-4997

March 12, 1947

BY: C. C. McCULLOH, Attorney General

TO: Mr. B. G. Dwyre State Highway Engineer New Mexico State Highway Department Santa Fe, New Mexico

{*20} We wish to acknowledge receipt of your inquiry of the 10th instant relative to the constitutionality of enactments of the legislature authorizing the establishment of limited access highways within and in the vicinity of certain towns and cities.

Evidently you are concerned with whether or not such are in violation of Section 24, Article 4 of the New Mexico Constitution which prohibits the legislature from "enacting any law providing for the laying out, opening, altering or working roads or highways except as to state roads extending into more than one county".

It was held in the case of Borrowdale v. Board of County Commissioners, {*21} 23 N.M. -- 1, 163 P. 721, that an act of the legislature creating a designated route for a state highway extending into more than one county, does not violate this section, even though provision is made for working the road in one county only.

The Supreme Court of this State also held in Gallegos v. Conroy, 38 N.M. 154, 29 P. 2d 334, that the construction of a "Y" which will become part of Highway 66, a main trunk highway traversing the entire state, is not in violation of this section.

Therefore, it is our conclusion that enactments of the legislature which provide for the establishment of limited access highways within and in the vicinity of cities and towns as a part of or improvement of a State Road does not violate our constitution even though in establishing such all work is done in only one county.

Trusting the aforementioned satisfies your inquiry, I am

By ROBT. V. WOLLARD,

Asst. Atty. General

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.