Attorney General Opinions and Advisory Letters

Decision Information

Decision Content

Opinion No. 58-01

January 6, 1958

BY: OPINION OF FRED M. STANDLEY, Attorney General Robert F. Pyatt, Assistant Attorney General

TO: Mrs. Georgia L. Lusk, Superintendent of Public Instruction, Santa Fe, New Mexico

QUESTION

QUESTION

When a municipal school district is consolidated with one or more rural districts, is the municipal board of education the governing board of the consolidated district until the next regular school election?

CONCLUSION

Yes.

OPINION

ANALYSIS

Your letter requesting this Opinion refers to Opinion of the Attorney General No. 57-112, dated May 27, 1957, and asks that we re-examine the same to determine its correctness. We are happy to do so.

After lengthy consideration, extended debate among ourselves, and upon more mature reflection, we are of the opinion that No. 57-112 is erroneous and that lawyers, like the balance of the human race, make mistakes on occasion.

That paragraph of § 73-20-4, N.M.S.A., 1953 Compilation, 1957 Supp., which controls this question is as follows:

"When a municipal school district or a rural independent district is consolidated with one (1) or more rural districts, the municipal school board or the rural independent board shall be the governing board for the consolidated district until the next regular school election, at which time successors to board members whose terms shall have expired shall be elected by the electors of the consolidated district in the same manner as members of boards of education in municipal school districts are elected."

Of course, this could result in obliterating a county school board, but such is inevitable when we bear in mind the quoted provision deals with consolidation of a municipal (or rural independent) school district with one or more rural districts, which latter are the only districts which can be under county school board jurisdiction, and which districts do not have independent governing boards as such term is used in § 73-20-4, supra.

The view taken by us in 57-112 that a rural district has a governing board of its own i.e., the county board, was incorrect for the reasons above given, and to that extent is hereby overruled. Any other construction would render the quoted provision meaningless.

By way of statement and not excuse, we suggest No. 57-112 and this opinion be placed in your legislative file, as § 73-20-4, supra, at least as to this question, could well be clarified.

1957

57-330

57-329

57-328

57-327

57-326

57-325

57-324

57-323

57-322

57-321

57-320

57-319

57-317

57-316

57-315

57-314

57-313

57-312

57-311

57-310

57-309

57-308

57-307

57-306

57-304

57-305

57-303

57-302

57-301

57-300

57-299

57-298

57-297

57-296

57-295

57-294

57-293

57-292

57-291

57-290

57-289

57-288

57-287

57-286

57-285

57-284

57-283

57-282

57-281

57-280

57-279

57-277

57-276

57-275

57-274

57-273

57-272

57-271

57-270

57-269

57-268

57-267

57-266

57-265

57-264

57-263

57-262

57-261

57-260

57-259

57-258

57-257

57-256

57-255

57-254

57-253

57-252

57-251

57-250

57-249

57-248

57-247

57-246

57-245

57-244

57-243

57-242

57-241

57-240

57-239

57-238

57-237

57-236

57-235

57-234

57-233

57-232

57-231

57-230

57-229

57-228

57-227

57-226

57-225

57-224

57-223

57-222

57-221

57-220

57-219

57-218

57-217

57-216

57-215

57-214

57-213

57-212

57-211

57-210

57-209

57-208

57-207

57-206

57-205

57-204

57-203

57-202

57-201

57-200

57-199

57-198

57-197

57-196

57-195

57-194

57-193

57-192

57-191

57-190

57-189

57-188

57-187

57-186

57-185

57-184

57-183

57-182

57-181

57-180

57-179

57-178

57-177

57-176

57-175

57-174

57-149 (Substitute)

57-173

57-172

57-171

57-170

57-169

57-168

57-167

57-166

57-165

57-164

57-163

57-162

57-161

57-160

57-159

57-158

57-157

57-156

57-155

57-154

57-153

57-152

57-151

57-150

57-148

57-147

57-146

57-145

57-144

57-143

57-142

57-141

57-60-A

57-140

57-139

57-138

57-136

57-135

57-134

57-133

57-132

57-137

57-131

57-130

57-129

57-128

57-127

57-126

57-125

57-124

57-123

57-122

57-121

57-120

57-119

57-118

57-117

57-116

57-115

57-114

57-113

57-112

57-111

57-110

57-109

57-108

57-107

57-106

57-105

57-104

57-103

57-102

57-101

57-100

57-99

57-98

57-97

57-96

57-95

57-94

57-92

57-93

57-93

57-91

57-90

57-89

57-88

57-87

57-86

57-85

57-84

57-83

57-82

57-81

57-80

57-79

57-78

57-77

57-76

57-75

57-74

57-73

57-72

57-71

57-70

57-69

57-68

57-67

57-66

57-65

57-64

57-63

57-62

57-61

57-60

57-59

57-58

57-57

57-56

57-55

57-54

57-53

57-52

57-51

57-50

57-49

57-48

57-47

57-46

57-45

57-44

57-43

57-42

57-41

57-40

57-39

57-38

57-37

57-36

57-35

57-34

57-33

57-32

57-31

57-30

57-29

57-28

57-27

57-26

57-25

57-21

57-24

57-23

57-22

57-20

57-19

57-18

57-17

57-16

57-15

57-13

57-12

57-10

57-09

57-07

57-14

57-11

57-06

57-05

57-04

57-03

57-02

57-01

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.