Attorney General Opinions and Advisory Letters

Decision Information

Decision Content

Opinion No. 61-01

January 5, 1961

BY: OPINION OF EARL E. HARTLEY, Attorney General Boston E. Witt, Assistant Attorney General

TO: Mr. Richard T. Whitley, Assistant District Attorney, Clayton, New Mexico

QUESTION

QUESTION

Do membership application fees for rural electric cooperatives come within the provisions of the Disposition of Unclaimed Property Act?

CONCLUSION

No.

OPINION

ANALYSIS

The section of the Unclaimed Property Act that deals with utilities is Sec. 22-22-5, N.M.S.A., 1953 Comp. (PS), which reads in part as follows:

"The following funds held or owing by any utility are presumed abandoned:

A. Any deposit made by a subscriber with a utility to secure payment for, or any sum paid in advance for, utility services to be furnished in this state, less any lawful deductions, that has remained unclaimed by the person appearing on the records of the utility entitled thereto for more than ten [10] years after the termination of the services for which the deposit or advance payment was made.

* * *"

We have been unable to find any case that deals with the problem here presented either in this state or in any state that has adopted the Uniform Disposition of Unclaimed Property Act, We can, therefore, only ascertain the intent of the legislature by construing the language used by it. It appears relatively clear to us that the legislature did not intend to include membership fees within the purview of this statute. The whole tenor of this section relates to deposits or advances with a utility to insure payment of the utility bills subsequently incurred. Such is not a membership fee. It is not normally returnable nor can it normally be called an advance payment for utility service. It is simply an administrative fee or charge made by the company which is paid only once but is not applicable to future cost of services incurred by a subscriber. It is more in the nature of dues than an advance or deposit.

1960

60-245

60-244

60-243

60-242

60-241

60-240

60-239

60-238

60-237

60-236

60-235

60-234

60-233

60-232

60-231

60-230

60-229

60-228

60-227

60-226

60-225

60-224

60-223

60-222

60-221

60-220

60-219

60-218

60-217

60-216

60-215

60-214

60-213

60-212

60-211

60-210

60-209

60-208

60-207

60-206

60-205

60-204

60-203

60-202

60-201

60-200

60-199

60-198

60-197

60-196

60-195

60-194

60-193

60-192

60-191

60-190

60-189

60-187

60-188

60-186

60-185

60-184

60-183

60-182

60-181

60-180

60-179

60-178

60-177

60-176

60-175

60-174

60-173

60-172

60-171

60-170

60-169

60-168

60-167

60-166

60-165

60-164

60-163

60-162

60-161

60-160

60-159

60-158

60-157

60-156

60-155

60-154

60-153

60-152

60-151

60-150

60-149

60-148

60-146

60-147

60-145

60-144

60-143

60-142

60-141

60-140

60-139

60-138

60-137

60-136

60-135

60-134

60-133

60-132

60-131

60-130

60-129

60-128

60-127

60-126

60-125

60-124

60-123

60-122

60-121

60-120

60-119

60-118

60-116

60-117

60-115

60-114

60-113

60-112

60-111

60-110

60-109

60-108

60-107

60-106

60-105

60-104

60-103

60-102

60-101

60-100

60-99

60-98

60-97

60-96

60-95

60-94

60-93

60-92

60-91

60-90

60-89

60-88

60-87

60-86

60-85

60-84

60-83

60-82

60-81

60-80

60-79

60-78

60-77

60-76

60-73

60-75

60-74

60-72

60-71

60-70

60-69

60-68

60-67

60-66

60-65

60-64

60-63

60-62

60-61

60-60

60-59

60-58

60-57

60-56

60-55

60-54

60-53

60-52

60-51

60-50

60-49

60-48

60-47

60-46

60-45

60-44

60-43

60-42

60-41

60-40

60-39

60-38

60-37

60-36

60-35

60-34

60-33

60-32

60-31

60-30

60-29

60-28

60-27

60-26

60-25

60-24

60-23

60-22

60-21

60-20

60-19

60-18

60-17

60-16

60-15

60-14

60-13

60-12

60-11

60-10

60-09

60-08

60-07

60-06

60-05

60-04

60-03

60-02

60-01

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.