Attorney General Opinions and Advisory Letters

Decision Information

Decision Content

Opinion No. 69-68

June 23, 1969

BY: OPINION OF JAMES A. MALONEY, Attorney General Vince D'Angelo, Assistant Attorney General

TO: William Gallagher, Jr., Industrial Development Representative, Department of Development, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501

QUESTIONS

QUESTIONS

1. Is a company liable for the New Mexico ad valorem tax on the value of components brought into New Mexico from another state, processed into a finished product here, and then shipped to a customer outside the state?

2. Is a company liable for the New Mexico ad valorem tax on the value of components brought into New Mexico from another state, processed into a finished product here, and then shipped to another division of the same company located outside the state?

CONCLUSIONS

1. No.

2. No.

OPINION

{*103} ANALYSIS

We shall consider both questions together. The applicable statute provides:

"72-2-1.1. Place of listing and assessment. -- Personal property which is moving interstate commerce through or over the territory of New Mexico or which was consigned to a warehouse or factory within New Mexico from outside the state, for storage, manufacturing processing, or fabricating in transit to a final destination, whether specified when transportation begins or afterwards, which is also outside the state, shall be deemed not to have acquired a situs in New Mexico for purposes of ad valorem taxation." (Emphasis supplied.)

It is our opinion that the broad language of this statute exempts components brought into New Mexico from out of state, processed into a finished product and then shipped out of state, from the New Mexico ad valorem tax. The statute provides the exemption whether the goods are shipped to an out-of-state customer or to another division of the same company located outside New Mexico.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.