Advanced Search
- All Databases (261)
- New Mexico Appellate Reports (93)
- New Mexico Laws and Court Rules (168)
261 result(s)
-
1.
Chapter 40 - Domestic Affairs
Current New Mexico Statutes Annotated 1978 - Chapter 40 NMSA 1978For local district court rules and forms, see LR2-Form J and LR11-114.
cited by 2,516 documents -
2.
Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co. v. Ross - 06/17/2024
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Unreported OpinionsDefendant, however, has not pointed us to anything in the record that demonstrates the district court limited Defendant’s ability to file his own form of judgment or that it otherwise violated the procedure set forth in either Rule 1-058 or LR2-125. [...] {31} Moreover, having reviewed the briefs of both parties, the motions and arguments presented to the district court, and the procedure regarding entry of judgment against Defendant, we conclude that the district court adhered to both Rule 1-058 and LR2-125. [...] All of these steps conform with the procedure set forth in both Rule 1-058 and LR2-125, and we discern no error that could constitute a basis for reversal.
-
3.
Absolute Resolutions Inv., LLC v. Andazola - 06/10/2024
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Unreported Opinions[RP 56-58] As a consequence, default judgment was entered against her pursuant to LR2-603(E)(1)(d) NMRA (“All parties shall participate in good faith in the arbitration proceedings. [...] See LR2-603(E)(1)(a) (indicating that assigned judges “should not hear any matters after an arbitrator is appointed” except a few specified matters, which do not include objections or motions to dismiss). [...] See LR2-603(F)(1) (“[A] party may not appeal an award of default, including an award of default entered under Subparagraph (E)(1)(d) of this rule.”).
-
4.
State v. McCalep - 06/07/2024
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Unreported OpinionsSee LR2-308(F)(7) NMRA (2021, amended 2022) (“Substitution of counsel alone ordinarily shall not constitute good cause for an extension of time.”).[2] While Defendant’s second attorney certainly may not have known about the alleged impropriety of the victim’s out-of-court identification until the attorney’s entry in the [...] [2]LR2-308(F)(7) was amended on August 29, 2022, and the good cause language was removed.
-
5.
State v. Ornelas - 05/14/2024
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Slip OpinionsSee LR2-308(F)(3)(a) NMRA (2018).[1] The local rule requires Track 1 cases to be tried within 210 days (approximately seven months) from arraignment, absent a finding of exceptional circumstances. [...] The time period would extend well past the seven months allowed by LR2-308(F)(5)(a) for Track 1 cases. [...] [1]All citations to LR2-308, the special pilot rule governing time limits for criminal proceedings in the Second Judicial District Court, are to the 2018 amendment, which was in place in 2021 when these proceedings took place.
-
6.
Rule Set 1 - Rules of Civil Procedure for the District Courts
NMRA Unannotated - Rule Set 1 NMRA1999-NMCA-135, 128 N.M. 177, 991 P.2d 7 (Ct. App. 1999) (noting that a party sought a protective order to seal the district court record of the proceedings); LR2-111 NMRA [withdrawn] (“... a court may seal a file or other record upon a party’s written motion or the court’s own motion, and showing of good cause.”), New
-
7.
Rule Set 1 - Rules of Civil Procedure for the District Courts
Current New Mexico Rules Annotated - Rule Set 1 NMRA1999-NMCA-135, 128 N.M. 177, 991 P.2d 7 (Ct. App. 1999) (noting that a party sought a protective order to seal the district court record of the proceedings); LR2-111 NMRA [withdrawn] (“... a court may seal a file or other record upon a party’s written motion or the court’s own motion, and showing of good cause.”), New [...] — LR2-111 NMRA, referenced in the committee commentary, was withdrawn by Supreme Court Order No. 16-8300-015, effective December 31, 2016.
cited by 4,506 documents -
8.
Rule Set 5 - Rules of Criminal Procedure for the District Courts
NMRA Unannotated - Rule Set 5 NMRAThis rule does not alter the disclosure requirements of Rules 5-501 and 5-502 NMRA, nor does it alter any requirement to provide a witness list, see, e.g., Rules 5-503, 5-508, and LR2-308 NMRA. Under Paragraph C, an attorney must provide an unredacted version of documents and materials subject to disclosure.
-
9.
Rule Set 5 - Rules of Criminal Procedure for the District Courts
Current New Mexico Rules Annotated - Rule Set 5 NMRA— Where defendant filed motions, under the former version of local rule LR2-308, to exclude witnesses and to suppress all audio and video evidence based on the State’s refusal to assist in scheduling witness interviews in the four months since defendant had been arraigned and for failure to comply with its discovery [...] This rule does not alter the disclosure requirements of Rules 5-501 and 5-502 NMRA, nor does it alter any requirement to provide a witness list, see, e.g., Rules 5-503, 5-508, and LR2-308 NMRA. Under Paragraph C, an attorney must provide an unredacted version of documents and materials subject to disclosure.
cited by 2,155 documents -
10.
Rule Set 23 - Supreme Court General Rules
Current New Mexico Rules Annotated - Rule Set 23 NMRALR2-308 NMRA. [...] LR2-308. (3) Previous version: LR2-308 NMRA (2015).
cited by 501 documents -
11.
Rule Set 23 - Supreme Court General Rules
NMRA Unannotated - Rule Set 23 NMRALR2-308 NMRA. [...] LR2-308. (3) Previous version: LR2-308 NMRA (2015).
-
12.
District 2 - Rules of the District Court of the Second Judicial District
Current New Mexico Rules Annotated - District 2 NMRALR2-101 LR2-101 LR2-101 LR2-101 LR2-102 LR2-102 LR2-102 LR2-102 [...] LR2-103 LR2-103 LR2-103 LR2-103 LR2-104 LR2-104 LR2-104 LR2-104 [...] LR2-105 LR2-105 LR2-105 LR2-105 LR2-106 LR2-106 LR2-106 LR2-106
cited by 108 documents -
13.
District 2 - Rules of the District Court of the Second Judicial District
NMRA Unannotated - District 2 NMRALR2-101 LR2-101 LR2-101 LR2-101 LR2-102 LR2-102 LR2-102 LR2-102 [...] LR2-103 LR2-103 LR2-103 LR2-103 LR2-104 LR2-104 LR2-104 LR2-104 [...] LR2-105 LR2-105 LR2-105 LR2-105 LR2-106 LR2-106 LR2-106 LR2-106
-
14.
District 4 - Rules of the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District
Current New Mexico Rules Annotated - District 4 NMRA[Adopted by Supreme Court Order No. 12-8300-LR2, effective for all cases filed or pending on or after August 20, 2012; LR4-310 recompiled and amended as LR2-202 by Supreme Court Order No. 16-8300-015, effective for all cases pending or filed on or after December 31, 2016.]
cited by 11 documents -
15.
District 4 - Rules of the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District
NMRA Unannotated - District 4 NMRA[Adopted by Supreme Court Order No. 12-8300-LR2, effective for all cases filed or pending on or after August 20, 2012; LR4-310 recompiled and amended as LR2-202 by Supreme Court Order No. 16-8300-015, effective for all cases pending or filed on or after December 31, 2016.]
-
16.
District 6 - Rules of the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District
NMRA Unannotated - District 6 NMRA[Adopted, effective October 2, 2000; LR6-211 recompiled and amended as LR2-207 by Supreme Court Order No. 16-8300-015, effective for all cases pending or filed on or after December 31, 2016.] [...] [Adopted by Supreme Court Order No. 13-8300-LR2, effective for cases filed or pending on or after April 15, 2013; LR6-217 recompiled and amended as LR6-213 by Supreme Court Order No. 16-8300-015, effective for all cases pending or filed on or after December 31, 2016; as amended by Supreme Court Order No. 19-8300-002,
-
17.
District 6 - Rules of the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District
Current New Mexico Rules Annotated - District 6 NMRA[Adopted, effective October 2, 2000; LR6-211 recompiled and amended as LR2-207 by Supreme Court Order No. 16-8300-015, effective for all cases pending or filed on or after December 31, 2016.] [...] [Adopted by Supreme Court Order No. 13-8300-LR2, effective for cases filed or pending on or after April 15, 2013; LR6-217 recompiled and amended as LR6-213 by Supreme Court Order No. 16-8300-015, effective for all cases pending or filed on or after December 31, 2016; as amended by Supreme Court Order No. 19-8300-002,
cited by 27 documents -
18.
District 7 - Rules of the District Court of the Seventh Judicial District
Current New Mexico Rules Annotated - District 7 NMRA[Adopted by Supreme Court Order No. 12-8300-LR2, effective for all cases filed or pending on or after August 20, 2012; LR7-019 recompiled as LR7-203 by Supreme Court Order No. 16-8300-015, effective for all cases pending or filed on or after December 31, 2016.]
cited by 9 documents -
19.
District 7 - Rules of the District Court of the Seventh Judicial District
NMRA Unannotated - District 7 NMRA[Adopted by Supreme Court Order No. 12-8300-LR2, effective for all cases filed or pending on or after August 20, 2012; LR7-019 recompiled as LR7-203 by Supreme Court Order No. 16-8300-015, effective for all cases pending or filed on or after December 31, 2016.]
-
20.
District 12 - Rules of the District Court of the Twelfth Judicial District
Current New Mexico Rules Annotated - District 12 NMRA[Adopted by Supreme Court Order No. 13-8300-LR2, effective for cases filed or pending on or after April 15, 2013; LR12-101 recompiled and amended as LR12-201 by Supreme Court Order No. 16-8300-015, effective for all cases pending or filed on or after December 31, 2016; as amended by Supreme Court Order No. 18-8300-022,
cited by 8 documents -
21.
District 12 - Rules of the District Court of the Twelfth Judicial District
NMRA Unannotated - District 12 NMRA[Adopted by Supreme Court Order No. 13-8300-LR2, effective for cases filed or pending on or after April 15, 2013; LR12-101 recompiled and amended as LR12-201 by Supreme Court Order No. 16-8300-015, effective for all cases pending or filed on or after December 31, 2016; as amended by Supreme Court Order No. 18-8300-022,
-
22.
State v. Gurule - 12/07/2023
Supreme Court of New Mexico - Slip Opinions{86} The district court vacated the February 2, 2015, trial setting and scheduled trial for February 8, 2016, as a result of “a congested court docket” and “the impending imposition of LR2-400” NMRA (subsequently amended and recompiled as LR2-308 NMRA).
-
23.
State v. Groves - 11/08/2023
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Unreported OpinionsUnder Rule 5-501(A)(5), the state shall within ten days after a defendant’s arraignment disclose to the defendant “a written list of the names and addresses of all witnesses which the prosecutor intends to call at the trial.” Under LR2-308(C)(4) NMRA, the state also has “a continuing duty to disclose additional information [...] {23} Here, the district court found that the State complied with its duties to disclose under both Rule 5-501 and LR2-308. [...] Garcia complies with LR2-308 and [Rule] 5-501.” On appeal, Defendant does not attack the district court’s finding that the State complied with its duty to disclose, only that the State entered into a plea deal with Mr. Garcia too late to add him as a witness.
-
24.
Simpson v. Harris - 07/31/2023
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Unreported Opinions{7} Subsequently, Respondent hired an attorney, who requested permission from the district court to file a twenty-six-page (including exhibits) motion to set aside the default order of protection because the motion exceeded the ten-page limit for motions under LR2-116 NMRA. This request was denied, and Respondent instead
-
25.
Chapter 40 - Domestic Affairs (2023)
Historical New Mexico Statutes Annotated 1978 - Chapter 40 NMSA 1978For local district court rules and forms, see LR2-Form J and LR11-114.