Advanced Search

Syntax: "", OR, AND, EXACT(), /p, /s, /n
This search field is punctuation sensitive.

Be aware that docket numbers may contain commas (e.g. No. 27,270).

This search field is punctuation sensitive.

Be aware that docket numbers may contain commas (e.g. No. 27,270).

This search field is punctuation sensitive.

Be aware that docket numbers may contain commas (e.g. No. 27,270).

(YYYY or MM/DD/YYYY)
Sort by: Relevance Date

261 result(s)

  • 251.

    District 2 - Rules of the District Court of the Second Judicial District (1995)

    Historical New Mexico Rules Annotated - District 2 NMRA

    LR2-130) (signature blocks, see Second Judicial District Local Rules, Rules LR2-118 and LR2-130)   [...]  LR2-130) (signature blocks, see Second Judicial District Local Rules, Rules LR2-118 and LR2-130)   [...]  LR2-130) (signature blocks, see Second Judicial District Local Rules, Rule LR2-118 and Rule LR2-130)

  • 252.

    Chapter 40 - Domestic Affairs (1994 Repl.) (1994)

    Historical New Mexico Statutes Annotated 1978 - Chapter 40 NMSA 1978

    For local district court rules and forms, see LR1-705, LR1-Form G, LR2-503, LR2-Form J, LR2-Form Q, LR3-Form 3.55, LR3-Form 3.56, LR5-504, LR8-108C, LR9-606, and LR11-114.

  • 253.

    Aragon v. Westside Jeep/Eagle - 1994-NMSC-060 - 117 N.M. 720 - 05/26/1994

    Supreme Court of New Mexico - Reported Opinions

    {4} On December 7, 1992, the district court entered an order referring the case to court-annexed arbitration under LR2-603.   [...]  Westside Jeep argued that LR2-603(VI)(B)(1) required notice to be filed within fifteen days and expressly stated that no extensions were allowed.   [...]  We do not agree that the district court lost jurisdiction over this case when the Aragons failed to timely file a notice of appeal as required by LR2-603(VI)(B)(1).

    cited by 67 documents
  • 254.

    District 2 - Rules of the District Court of the Second Judicial District (1994)

    Historical New Mexico Rules Annotated - District 2 NMRA

    LR2-130) (signature blocks, see Second Judicial District Local Rules, Rules LR2-118 and LR2-130)   [...]  LR2-130) (signature blocks, see Second Judicial District Local Rules, Rules LR2-118 and LR2-130)   [...]  LR2-130) (signature blocks, see Second Judicial District Local Rules, Rule LR2-118 and Rule LR2-130)

  • 255.

    Chapter 40 - Domestic Affairs (1993 Supp.) (1993)

    Historical New Mexico Statutes Annotated 1978 - Chapter 40 NMSA 1978

    For local district court rules and forms, see LR1-705, LR1-Form G, LR2-503, LR2-Form J, LR2-Form Q, LR5-504 and LR9-606.

  • 256.

    District 2 - Rules of the District Court of the Second Judicial District (1993)

    Historical New Mexico Rules Annotated - District 2 NMRA

    LR2-130) (signature blocks, see Second Judicial District Local Rules, Rules LR2-118 and LR2-130)   [...]  LR2-130) (signature blocks, see Second Judicial District Local Rules, Rules LR2-118 and LR2-130)   [...]  LR2-130) (signature blocks, see Second Judicial District Local Rules, Rule LR2-118 and Rule LR2-130)

  • 257.

    District 2 - Rules of the District Court of the Second Judicial District (1992)

    Historical New Mexico Rules Annotated - District 2 NMRA

    LR2-130) (signature blocks, see Second Judicial District Local Rules, Rules LR2-118 and LR2-130)   [...]  LR2-130) (signature blocks, see Second Judicial District Local Rules, Rules LR2-118 and LR2-130)   [...]  LR2-130) (signature blocks, see Second Judicial District Local Rules, Rule LR2-118 and Rule LR2-130)

  • 258.

    C. de Baca v. Baca - 1964-NMSC-006 - 73 N.M. 387 - 01/13/1964

    Supreme Court of New Mexico - Reported Opinions

    * * *" Other decisions to like effect are State Game Commission v. Tackett, 71 N.M. 400, 379 P.2d 54; Sellman v. Haddock, 62 N.M. 391, 310 P.2d 1045; Keirsey v. Hirsch, 58 N.M. 18, 265 P.2d 346, 43 A. L.R.2d 929; Hugh K. Gale Post No. 2182 v. Norris, 53 N.M. 58, 201 P.2d 777; Page v. Town of Gallup, 26 N.M. 239, 191 P. 460.

    cited by 92 documents
  • 259.

    Sproles v. McDonald - 1962-NMSC-071 - 70 N.M. 168 - 06/05/1962

    Supreme Court of New Mexico - Reported Opinions

    It is also the rule followed by the Colorado Supreme Court in Golden Press, Inc. v. Rylands, 124 Colo. 122, 235 P.2d 592, 28 A. L.R.2d 672, a case involving encroachments where an injunction decree was reversed for failure to consider the relative advantages and disadvantages that would flow therefrom.

    cited by 96 documents
  • 260.

    Hammell v. City of Albuquerque - 1958-NMSC-005 - 63 N.M. 374 - 01/10/1958

    Supreme Court of New Mexico - Reported Opinions

    {9} And in Bradshaw v. City of Seattle, 43 Wash.2d 766, 264 P.2d 265, 272, 42 A. L.R.2d 800, it is said:

    cited by 42 documents
  • 261.

    Nixon-Foster Serv. Co. v. Morrow - 1936-NMSC-068 - 41 N.M. 67 - 12/21/1936

    Supreme Court of New Mexico - Reported Opinions

    The oral evidence rule aside, the defendant might reply in the language of the court, Ry. Co. v. Kisch, L.R. 2 H. L. 120, quoted in Poe v. Texas & Pac. Ry. Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 95 S.W.2d 505, 508, as follows: "When once it is established that there has been any fraudulent misrepresentation, * * * by which a person has

    cited by 43 documents