Advanced Search
- All Databases (261)
- New Mexico Appellate Reports (93)
- New Mexico Laws and Court Rules (168)
261 result(s)
-
151.
District 7 - Rules of the District Court of the Seventh Judicial District (2020)
Historical New Mexico Rules Annotated - District 7 NMRA[Adopted by Supreme Court Order No. 12-8300-LR2, effective for all cases filed or pending on or after August 20, 2012; LR7-019 recompiled as LR7-203 by Supreme Court Order No. 16-8300-015, effective for all cases pending or filed on or after December 31, 2016.]
-
152.
District 7 - Rules of the District Court of the Seventh Judicial District (2019)
Historical New Mexico Rules Annotated - District 7 NMRA[Adopted by Supreme Court Order No. 12-8300-LR2, effective for all cases filed or pending on or after August 20, 2012; LR7-019 recompiled as LR7-203 by Supreme Court Order No. 16-8300-015, effective for all cases pending or filed on or after December 31, 2016.]
-
153.
State v. Aslin - 2020-NMSC-004 - 12/12/2019
Supreme Court of New Mexico - Reported OpinionsSee LR1-306(C); LR4-301(C) NMRA; LR13-301(C) NMRA. The Second Judicial District also designates specific probation violations as technical violations under its TVP and includes as well “any other violations other than a new criminal offense.” LR2-307(C) NMRA. On the other hand, the Fifth and Seventh Judicial Districts
cited by 23 documents -
154.
Lyman v. Kern - 2000-NMCA-013 - 128 N.M. 582 - 12/28/1999
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Reported OpinionsSee Rule LR2-603 NMRA 1999.
cited by 89 documents -
155.
C. de Baca v. Baca - 1964-NMSC-006 - 73 N.M. 387 - 01/13/1964
Supreme Court of New Mexico - Reported Opinions* * *" Other decisions to like effect are State Game Commission v. Tackett, 71 N.M. 400, 379 P.2d 54; Sellman v. Haddock, 62 N.M. 391, 310 P.2d 1045; Keirsey v. Hirsch, 58 N.M. 18, 265 P.2d 346, 43 A. L.R.2d 929; Hugh K. Gale Post No. 2182 v. Norris, 53 N.M. 58, 201 P.2d 777; Page v. Town of Gallup, 26 N.M. 239, 191 P. 460.
cited by 92 documents -
156.
State v. Malloy - 2001-NMCA-067 - 131 N.M. 222 - 06/15/2001
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Reported Opinions{7} The trial court, District Judge Allen, determined that "there was ample reason to support the judges' [sic] decision to seal the affidavit if allowed under LR2-111."
cited by 42 documents -
157.
Sproles v. McDonald - 1962-NMSC-071 - 70 N.M. 168 - 06/05/1962
Supreme Court of New Mexico - Reported OpinionsIt is also the rule followed by the Colorado Supreme Court in Golden Press, Inc. v. Rylands, 124 Colo. 122, 235 P.2d 592, 28 A. L.R.2d 672, a case involving encroachments where an injunction decree was reversed for failure to consider the relative advantages and disadvantages that would flow therefrom.
cited by 96 documents -
158.
State v. Lopez - 2023-NMSC-011 - 03/30/2023
Supreme Court of New Mexico - Reported OpinionsIn Seigling, the district court excluded witnesses and suppressed all audio and video evidence after the state failed to satisfy the discovery requirements of LR 2-400(D) (2014).
cited by 2 documents -
159.
District 4 - Rules of the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District (2016)
Historical New Mexico Rules Annotated - District 4 NMRA[Adopted by Supreme Court Order No. 12-8300-LR2, effective for all cases filed or pending on or after August 20, 2012.]
-
160.
District 4 - Rules of the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District (2015)
Historical New Mexico Rules Annotated - District 4 NMRA[Adopted by Supreme Court Order No. 12-8300-LR2, effective for all cases filed or pending on or after August 20, 2012.]
-
161.
District 4 - Rules of the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District (2014)
Historical New Mexico Rules Annotated - District 4 NMRA[Adopted by Supreme Court Order No. 12-8300-LR2, effective for all cases filed or pending on or after August 20, 2012.]
-
162.
District 4 - Rules of the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District (2013)
Historical New Mexico Rules Annotated - District 4 NMRA[Adopted by Supreme Court Order No. 12-8300-LR2, effective for all cases filed or pending on or after August 20, 2012.]
-
163.
Nixon-Foster Serv. Co. v. Morrow - 1936-NMSC-068 - 41 N.M. 67 - 12/21/1936
Supreme Court of New Mexico - Reported OpinionsThe oral evidence rule aside, the defendant might reply in the language of the court, Ry. Co. v. Kisch, L.R. 2 H. L. 120, quoted in Poe v. Texas & Pac. Ry. Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 95 S.W.2d 505, 508, as follows: "When once it is established that there has been any fraudulent misrepresentation, * * * by which a person has
cited by 43 documents -
164.
Rule Set 23 - Supreme Court General Rules (2023)
Historical New Mexico Rules Annotated - Rule Set 23 NMRALR2-308 NMRA. [...] LR2-308. (3) Previous version: LR2-308 NMRA (2015).
-
165.
Rule Set 23 - Supreme Court General Rules (2022)
Historical New Mexico Rules Annotated - Rule Set 23 NMRALR2-308 NMRA. [...] LR2-308. (3) Previous version: LR2-308 NMRA (2015).
-
166.
State v. Quarles - 06/30/2022
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Unreported OpinionsHowever, the district court dismissed the motion without reaching its merits because the district court found that the motion was untimely filed contrary to the scheduling order issued pursuant to LR 2-308 NMRA (the local rule).
-
167.
State v. Gunthorpe - 02/17/2020
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Unreported Opinions{18} Defendant’s case was not scheduled for trial prior to the subsequent entry of LR2-400 NMRA (2014), which resulted in a February 2, 2015 order transferring the case from Judge Chavez to Judge Judith K. Nakamura.
-
168.
Paz v. Tijerina - 2007-NMCA-109 - 142 N.M. 391 - 06/25/2007
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Reported OpinionsRule 1-054(D)(2) describes the types of costs that are generally recoverable, but together with LR2-302(A) NMRA, an itemized cost bill is required.
cited by 75 documents -
169.
State v. Jaramillo - 2004-NMCA-041 - 135 N.M. 322 - 02/13/2004
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Reported OpinionsSee LR1-304(A) NMRA 2003 (stating unless otherwise ordered by the court, all orders, judgments and decrees to be submitted to the judge by prevailing party within ten days after announcement of decision by judge if announced in open court, or twelve days following date of the letter announcing the decision); LR2-130(D) NMRA
cited by 35 documents -
170.
State v. Powers - 1998-NMCA-133 - 126 N.M. 114 - 07/23/1998
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Reported OpinionsCf. LR2-134 NMRA 1998 (ex parte order to show cause why a party should not be held in contempt must identify verbatim the portion of court's prior order on which contempt charge is based).
cited by 86 documents -
171.
Lozano v. Gte Lenkurt - 1996-NMCA-074 - 122 N.M. 103 - 06/20/1996
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Reported OpinionsTherefore, Judge Frank Zinn was appointed as neutral mediator and special master in accordance with SCRA 1986, LR2-602 (Repl. 1994) and SCRA 1986, 1-053 (Repl. 1992).
cited by 51 documents -
172.
District 6 - Rules of the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District
NMRA Unannotated - District 6 NMRA[Adopted, effective October 2, 2000; LR6-211 recompiled and amended as LR2-207 by Supreme Court Order No. 16-8300-015, effective for all cases pending or filed on or after December 31, 2016.] [...] [Adopted by Supreme Court Order No. 13-8300-LR2, effective for cases filed or pending on or after April 15, 2013; LR6-217 recompiled and amended as LR6-213 by Supreme Court Order No. 16-8300-015, effective for all cases pending or filed on or after December 31, 2016; as amended by Supreme Court Order No. 19-8300-002,
-
173.
Rule Set 23 - Supreme Court General Rules
Current New Mexico Rules Annotated - Rule Set 23 NMRALR2-308 NMRA. [...] LR2-308. (3) Previous version: LR2-308 NMRA (2015).
cited by 501 documents -
174.
O'Neel v. USAA Ins. Co. - 2002-NMCA-028 - 131 N.M. 630 - 01/16/2002
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Reported Opinions{22} In short, the district court's decision to award pre-arbitration attorney fees in this case in which fees were awarded on a basis other than the local rule involving court-annexed arbitration, LR2-603(VI)(D) NMRA 2001, does not have the far-reaching impact necessary to invoke the general public interest exception to
cited by 64 documents -
175.
State v. Gurule - 12/07/2023
Supreme Court of New Mexico - Slip Opinions{86} The district court vacated the February 2, 2015, trial setting and scheduled trial for February 8, 2016, as a result of “a congested court docket” and “the impending imposition of LR2-400” NMRA (subsequently amended and recompiled as LR2-308 NMRA).