Advanced Search
- All Databases (261)
- New Mexico Appellate Reports (93)
- New Mexico Laws and Court Rules (168)
93 result(s)
-
51.
Martinez v. Roscoe - 2001-NMCA-083 - 131 N.M. 137 - 04/19/2001
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Reported OpinionsCf. Rule LR2-116 NMRA 2001 (requiring corporations to be represented by counsel and allowing any papers filed by an unrepresented corporation to be struck by the court). [...] See LR2-116; Rowland, 506 U.S. at 202; Valentine L.L.C., 2000 WL 960961, *1; Local 16, 1999 WL 447459, *1-2.
cited by 35 documents -
52.
State v. Groves - 11/08/2023
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Unreported OpinionsUnder Rule 5-501(A)(5), the state shall within ten days after a defendant’s arraignment disclose to the defendant “a written list of the names and addresses of all witnesses which the prosecutor intends to call at the trial.” Under LR2-308(C)(4) NMRA, the state also has “a continuing duty to disclose additional information [...] {23} Here, the district court found that the State complied with its duties to disclose under both Rule 5-501 and LR2-308. [...] Garcia complies with LR2-308 and [Rule] 5-501.” On appeal, Defendant does not attack the district court’s finding that the State complied with its duty to disclose, only that the State entered into a plea deal with Mr. Garcia too late to add him as a witness.
-
53.
Pargin Realty ERA v. Schmidt - 02/08/2013
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Unreported OpinionsSimultaneously with its suit, Pargin filed an “Arbitration Certificate” in the district court pursuant to Second Judicial District Court LR 2-603 NMRA. The arbitration certificate certified that Pargin sought “only a money judgment and the amount sought does not exceed twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) exclusive of [...] In April 2010, the district court issued an order appointing an arbitrator for court-annexed arbitration pursuant to LR 2-603. [...] Mr. Schmidt filed notice of appeal from this arbitration award to the district court pursuant to LR 2-603.
-
54.
State v. McCalep - 06/07/2024
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Unreported OpinionsSee LR2-308(F)(7) NMRA (2021, amended 2022) (“Substitution of counsel alone ordinarily shall not constitute good cause for an extension of time.”).[2] While Defendant’s second attorney certainly may not have known about the alleged impropriety of the victim’s out-of-court identification until the attorney’s entry in the [...] [2]LR2-308(F)(7) was amended on August 29, 2022, and the good cause language was removed.
-
55.
Summit Elec. Supply Co., Inc. v. Rhodes Salmon P.C. - 2010-NMCA-086 - 148 N.M. 590 - 07/08/2010
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Reported OpinionsLR2-301.” LR2-301(B) provides that “[a] party seeking to reinstate a case pursuant to Rule 1-041(E)(2) . . . shall attach a copy of a proposed pretrial scheduling order to the motion to reinstate.” Rule 1-041(E)(2) provides that a district court that dismisses a case on its own motion following a 180-day period of
cited by 43 documents -
56.
State v. Gurule - 07/31/2019
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Unreported Opinions{17} As a result of a “congested court docket” and “the impending imposition of LR2-400[,]” NMRA[1] the district court vacated the February 2, 2015 trial setting and scheduled trial on February 8, 2016. [...] [1] Rule LR2-400 was amended and recompiled at Rule LR2-308 NMRA.
-
57.
State v. Sandoval - 06/09/2021
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Unreported Opinions{9} This case was governed by LR2-308 NMRA, the special case management pilot program for criminal cases pending in the Second Judicial District Court. [...] LR2-308(H)(1). While the imposition of sanctions is mandatory, the district court has discretion regarding the type of sanction to impose, subject to the considerations enunciated in State v. Harper, 2011-NMSC-044, ¶¶ 15-16, 150 N.M. 745, 266 P.3d 25: (1) the culpability of the offending party; (2) the prejudice to the
-
58.
Thomas v. Thomas - 1999-NMCA-135 - 128 N.M. 177 - 08/16/1999
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Reported Opinions{26} Local Rule 111 of the Second Judicial District, LR2-111 NMRA 1999, governs when the court may seal court records. [...] Nor did we discover in the record any statements that would render this an "extraordinary case," as required by LR2-111, beyond the usual acrimonious divorce and custody case.
cited by 88 documents -
59.
State v. Grossetete - 09/09/2021
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Unreported OpinionsPohl . . ., and other applicable case law.” [RP 75] Under the circumstances, it was not an abuse of discretion for the district court to find, as it did, that “[t]he State’s unilateral decision to submit an IPRA request and provide the defense with incomplete discovery [was] a violation of Rule 5-501 NMRA, LR2-308, and [the
-
60.
State v. Esquer - 09/26/2018
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Unreported OpinionsOn November 6, 2014, our Supreme Court adopted LR2-400 NMRA (2014). [...] {22} We agree that over six months of administrative delays, like the late December docket call and the rescheduling of that docket call to a scheduling conference in January 2015 in response to our Supreme Court’s adoption of LR2-400 NMRA (2014) was appropriately weighed against the State.
-
61.
Smith v. Village of Ruidoso - 1999-NMCA-151 - 128 N.M. 470 - 11/05/1999
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Reported OpinionsSee e.g., LR2-302 and -505 (Second Judicial District); see also Gillingham v. Reliable Chevrolet, 1998-NMCA-143, ¶29, 126 N.M. 30, 966 P.2d 197 (noting that certain expenses are generally not recoverable under LR2-302 (D)).
cited by 116 documents -
62.
Woodhull v. Meinel - 10/08/2013
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Unreported OpinionsNot only did Plaintiff fail to preserve this argument below, but our review provides that the awarded costs were within the parameters of Rule 1-054(D)(2) NMRA (recoverable costs) and LR 2-302 (addressing Rule 1-054), as referenced by the district court in its costs order.
-
63.
State v. Murray - 05/31/2022
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Unreported OpinionsSee generally Rule 5-805(C) NMRA (providing that technical violations are limited to violations that do not involve new criminal charges); LR2-307(C)(8) (same).
-
64.
Hammell v. City of Albuquerque - 1958-NMSC-005 - 63 N.M. 374 - 01/10/1958
Supreme Court of New Mexico - Reported Opinions{9} And in Bradshaw v. City of Seattle, 43 Wash.2d 766, 264 P.2d 265, 272, 42 A. L.R.2d 800, it is said:
cited by 42 documents -
65.
State v. Peina - 03/31/2023
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Unreported Opinions[BIC 2-3, 7] See LR2-307(B) NMRA (establishing technical violation program and identifying appropriate sanctions to be imposed upon participants when they commit their first, second, third, and fourth technical violations).
-
66.
State ex rel. CYFD v. Djamila B. - 2014-NMCA-045 - 02/10/2014
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Reported OpinionsSee LR2-103(A)(1), (4) (stating that the Second Judicial District Court judges and clerks are divided into four courts, two of which are the children’s court and the domestic relations court, and enumerating the cases within the purview of each court). [...] The domestic relations division of the district court handles, with enumerated exceptions not relevant here, “all cases of a domestic relations nature[.]” LR2-103(A)(4) NMRA. Chapter 40 of New Mexico’s statutes, entitled Domestic Affairs, includes the KGA within Article 10B. Thus, the domestic relations division of the
cited by 27 documents -
67.
Diepholz v. Park Plaza - 07/21/2010
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Unreported Opinions[RP 228-29] In response, Plaintiff contends that Rule 1-054(E) NMRA states that, when a motion for attorney fees is made, there shall be an opportunity for adversary admissions, and that LR2-302 NMRA permits a motion, possible objections, and a hearing if requested by the objecting party.
-
68.
State ex rel. Albuquerque Police Dept. v. One Black 1983 Chevrolet Van - 1995-NMCA-082 - 120 N.M. 280 - 06/29/1995
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Reported OpinionsCf. SCRA 1986, § 10A-LR2-123(A)(1) (Repl. 1994) (local rule requiring motion along with any attachments to be presented to the clerk).
cited by 63 documents -
69.
Herald v. Bd. of Regents of The Univ. of N.M. - 2015-NMCA-104 - 07/21/2015
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Reported OpinionsSee LR2-303 NMRA (stating that in the Second Judicial District Court, in civil, domestic relations, and probate actions, “[t]he electronic filing of documents . . . is mandatory for parties represented by attorneys”). [...] LR2-303. To avoid this absurd result, and in accord with the language of the rule, we conclude that “filing fees” as that term is used in Rule 1-054(D)(2) includes electronic filing fees.
cited by 49 documents -
70.
City of Santa Fe v. Huisinga - 08/23/2022
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Unreported OpinionsIT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the calculation of any deadlines in Rules 5-604, 6-506, 7-506, 8-506, and LR2-308 NMRA for all cases pending or filed on or after the date of this order shall not include any period of time-delay caused by the current public health emergency.
-
71.
Simpson v. Harris - 07/31/2023
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Unreported Opinions{7} Subsequently, Respondent hired an attorney, who requested permission from the district court to file a twenty-six-page (including exhibits) motion to set aside the default order of protection because the motion exceeded the ten-page limit for motions under LR2-116 NMRA. This request was denied, and Respondent instead
-
72.
State v. Aslin - 2020-NMSC-004 - 12/12/2019
Supreme Court of New Mexico - Reported OpinionsSee LR1-306(C); LR4-301(C) NMRA; LR13-301(C) NMRA. The Second Judicial District also designates specific probation violations as technical violations under its TVP and includes as well “any other violations other than a new criminal offense.” LR2-307(C) NMRA. On the other hand, the Fifth and Seventh Judicial Districts
cited by 23 documents -
73.
Lyman v. Kern - 2000-NMCA-013 - 128 N.M. 582 - 12/28/1999
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Reported OpinionsSee Rule LR2-603 NMRA 1999.
cited by 89 documents -
74.
C. de Baca v. Baca - 1964-NMSC-006 - 73 N.M. 387 - 01/13/1964
Supreme Court of New Mexico - Reported Opinions* * *" Other decisions to like effect are State Game Commission v. Tackett, 71 N.M. 400, 379 P.2d 54; Sellman v. Haddock, 62 N.M. 391, 310 P.2d 1045; Keirsey v. Hirsch, 58 N.M. 18, 265 P.2d 346, 43 A. L.R.2d 929; Hugh K. Gale Post No. 2182 v. Norris, 53 N.M. 58, 201 P.2d 777; Page v. Town of Gallup, 26 N.M. 239, 191 P. 460.
cited by 92 documents -
75.
State v. Malloy - 2001-NMCA-067 - 131 N.M. 222 - 06/15/2001
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Reported Opinions{7} The trial court, District Judge Allen, determined that "there was ample reason to support the judges' [sic] decision to seal the affidavit if allowed under LR2-111."
cited by 42 documents