Advanced Search
- All Databases (261)
- New Mexico Appellate Reports (93)
- New Mexico Laws and Court Rules (168)
93 result(s)
-
76.
Sproles v. McDonald - 1962-NMSC-071 - 70 N.M. 168 - 06/05/1962
Supreme Court of New Mexico - Reported OpinionsIt is also the rule followed by the Colorado Supreme Court in Golden Press, Inc. v. Rylands, 124 Colo. 122, 235 P.2d 592, 28 A. L.R.2d 672, a case involving encroachments where an injunction decree was reversed for failure to consider the relative advantages and disadvantages that would flow therefrom.
cited by 96 documents -
77.
State v. Lopez - 2023-NMSC-011 - 03/30/2023
Supreme Court of New Mexico - Reported OpinionsIn Seigling, the district court excluded witnesses and suppressed all audio and video evidence after the state failed to satisfy the discovery requirements of LR 2-400(D) (2014).
cited by 2 documents -
78.
Nixon-Foster Serv. Co. v. Morrow - 1936-NMSC-068 - 41 N.M. 67 - 12/21/1936
Supreme Court of New Mexico - Reported OpinionsThe oral evidence rule aside, the defendant might reply in the language of the court, Ry. Co. v. Kisch, L.R. 2 H. L. 120, quoted in Poe v. Texas & Pac. Ry. Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 95 S.W.2d 505, 508, as follows: "When once it is established that there has been any fraudulent misrepresentation, * * * by which a person has
cited by 43 documents -
79.
State v. Quarles - 06/30/2022
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Unreported OpinionsHowever, the district court dismissed the motion without reaching its merits because the district court found that the motion was untimely filed contrary to the scheduling order issued pursuant to LR 2-308 NMRA (the local rule).
-
80.
State v. Gunthorpe - 02/17/2020
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Unreported Opinions{18} Defendant’s case was not scheduled for trial prior to the subsequent entry of LR2-400 NMRA (2014), which resulted in a February 2, 2015 order transferring the case from Judge Chavez to Judge Judith K. Nakamura.
-
81.
Paz v. Tijerina - 2007-NMCA-109 - 142 N.M. 391 - 06/25/2007
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Reported OpinionsRule 1-054(D)(2) describes the types of costs that are generally recoverable, but together with LR2-302(A) NMRA, an itemized cost bill is required.
cited by 75 documents -
82.
State v. Jaramillo - 2004-NMCA-041 - 135 N.M. 322 - 02/13/2004
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Reported OpinionsSee LR1-304(A) NMRA 2003 (stating unless otherwise ordered by the court, all orders, judgments and decrees to be submitted to the judge by prevailing party within ten days after announcement of decision by judge if announced in open court, or twelve days following date of the letter announcing the decision); LR2-130(D) NMRA
cited by 35 documents -
83.
State v. Powers - 1998-NMCA-133 - 126 N.M. 114 - 07/23/1998
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Reported OpinionsCf. LR2-134 NMRA 1998 (ex parte order to show cause why a party should not be held in contempt must identify verbatim the portion of court's prior order on which contempt charge is based).
cited by 86 documents -
84.
Lozano v. Gte Lenkurt - 1996-NMCA-074 - 122 N.M. 103 - 06/20/1996
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Reported OpinionsTherefore, Judge Frank Zinn was appointed as neutral mediator and special master in accordance with SCRA 1986, LR2-602 (Repl. 1994) and SCRA 1986, 1-053 (Repl. 1992).
cited by 51 documents -
85.
O'Neel v. USAA Ins. Co. - 2002-NMCA-028 - 131 N.M. 630 - 01/16/2002
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Reported Opinions{22} In short, the district court's decision to award pre-arbitration attorney fees in this case in which fees were awarded on a basis other than the local rule involving court-annexed arbitration, LR2-603(VI)(D) NMRA 2001, does not have the far-reaching impact necessary to invoke the general public interest exception to
cited by 64 documents -
86.
State v. Gurule - 12/07/2023
Supreme Court of New Mexico - Slip Opinions{86} The district court vacated the February 2, 2015, trial setting and scheduled trial for February 8, 2016, as a result of “a congested court docket” and “the impending imposition of LR2-400” NMRA (subsequently amended and recompiled as LR2-308 NMRA).
-
87.
State v. Chavez - 2023-NMCA-071 - 06/26/2023
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Reported Opinions[1]Defendant also calls our attention to an observation the district court describes as “an aside” in its order: that allowing the State to seek a warrant after indictment would thwart the deadlines outlined in LR2-308 NMRA. Apart from calling our attention to this observation in the statement of facts section of his brief,
cited by 5 documents -
88.
State v. Stevenson - 2020-NMCA-005 - 10/22/2019
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Reported OpinionsAcata sat at the counsel table with the prosecutors, and that the State failed to disclose the arrest, thus violating LR2-400(D)(l), (3) NMRA (2016), as well as Rule 5-501(A)(3) NMRA. This, though, is not the same as a Brady violation and nothing in the motion was sufficient to raise an allegation of a Brady violation.
cited by 23 documents -
89.
N.M. Bd. of Veterinary Medicine v. Riegger - 2006-NMCA-069 - 139 N.M. 679 - 04/20/2006
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Reported OpinionsThe district court then remanded for the Board to redetermine sanctions in light of its memorandum opinion, directing the Board to file an itemized cost bill in accordance with LR 2-302 NMRA.
cited by 55 documents -
90.
State v. Ulibarri - 1999-NMCA-142 - 128 N.M. 546 - 10/20/1999
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Reported OpinionsSee also Second Judicial District Local Rules, LR2-401(A) NMRA 1999 ("Only parties, through counsel or pro se, shall have access to grand jury tapes without an order of the Court.").
cited by 96 documents -
91.
Dollens v. Wells Fargo Bank - 2015-NMCA-096 - 06/09/2015
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Reported OpinionsSee Rule 1-007.1 NMRA (providing only for motion, response, and reply); LR2-120(A) NMRA (requiring prior court approval for the filing of briefs and statements of supporting points and authorities for unopposed motions).
cited by 48 documents -
92.
State v. Vigil-Giron - 2014-NMCA-069 - 04/17/2014
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Reported OpinionsSee LR2-123(A)(2) (stating that “[a]s a condition of filing, all opposed motions . . . shall be presented to the clerk with . . .
cited by 147 documents -
93.
State v. Chavez - 2022-NMCA-007 - 10/01/2021
Court of Appeals of New Mexico - Reported OpinionsAnd in Defendant’s case, a local rule of the Second Judicial District Court, Rule LR2-308(G)(3) NMRA (2017), required the district court to consider “the complexity of the case” and “the number of witnesses” as well as “the time needed reasonably to address any eviden[tiary] issues[.]” The court did just that during a
cited by 15 documents