New Mexico Forms Library

Decision Information

Decision Content

14-1611. Shoplifting; alteration of label or container; essential elements.

            For you to find the defendant guilty of shoplifting [as charged in Count __________]1, the state must prove to your satisfaction beyond a reasonable doubt each of the following elements of the crime:

            1.         The defendant [altered a label, price tag or marking upon __________________ (describe merchandise)]2 [transferred __________________ (describe merchandise) from the container [in] [on]2 which it was displayed to another container];

            2.         The [altered] [transferred]2 merchandise had a market value3 [over $ __________4];

            [3.        The [altered] [transferred]2 merchandise was offered for sale to the public in a store;]5

            4.         The defendant intended to deprive __________________ (name of merchant) of all or some part of the value of this merchandise;

            5.         This happened in New Mexico on or about the __________ day of ______________, __________.

 

USE NOTES

            1.         Insert the count number if more than one count is charged.

            2.         Use applicable alternative.

            3.         See UJI 14-1602 for definition of market value.  Use this bracketed provision for merchandise if the value is over $250.  State whether the value of the merchandise at issue is "over $250," "over $500," "over $2,500," or "over $20,000."  If the charge is a petty misdemeanor ($250 or less), do not use this bracketed alternative.

            4.         If the charge is a second degree felony (over $20,000), use $20,000 in the blank.  If the charge is a third degree felony (over $2,500), use $2,500 in the blank.  If the charge is a fourth degree felony (over $500), use $500 in the blank.  If the charge is a misdemeanor (over $250), use $250 in the blank.

            5.         For use if there is an issue as to whether or not the items were merchandise in a store.

[As amended by Supreme Court Order No. 10-8300-039, effective December 31, 2010.]

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.