New Mexico Forms Library

Decision Information

Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 14 - Uniform Jury Instructions — Criminal - cited by 1,766 documents

Decision Content

14-5186.  Self defense against excessive force by a peace officer; deadly force by defendant.1

An issue in this case is whether the defendant acted in self defense. A defendant has the right to defend himself or herself against an officer only if the officer used excessive force. Excessive force means greater force than reasonably necessary.

The defendant acted in self defense if

1.         The officer used greater force than reasonable and necessary by __________________2; and

2.         There was an appearance of immediate danger of death or great bodily harm3 to the defendant as a result of __________________4; and

3.         The defendant was in fact put in fear of immediate death or great bodily harm and __________________5 because of that fear; and

4.         The apparent danger would have caused a reasonable person in the same circumstances to act as the defendant did.

The burden is on the state to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant did not act in self defense. If you have a reasonable doubt as to whether the defendant acted in self defense, you must find the defendant not guilty.

 

USE NOTES

1.         For use in nonhomicide cases when the self defense theory is based on the limited right of self defense against excessive force by a peace officer.  If this instruction is given, add to the essential elements instruction for the offense charged, “The defendant did not act in self defense.”

2.         Describe the act of the officer.

3.         The definition of “great bodily harm,” UJI 14-131 NMRA, must be given if not already given.

4.         Describe unlawful act, felony or act which would result in death or some great bodily harm as established by the evidence. Give at least enough detail to put the act in context of the evidence.

5.         Describe act of defendant, e.g., “struck Officer Richard Roe,” “choked Officer Richard Roe.”

[Adopted by Supreme Court Order No. 09-8300-028, effective September 16, 2009; as amended by Supreme Court Order No. 18-8300-012, effective for all cases pending or filed on or after December 31, 2018.]

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.