Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Chapter 52 - Workers' Compensation - cited by 1,970 documents
Citations - New Mexico Appellate Reports
AAA v. SCC - cited by 93 documents
James v. New Mexico Human Servs. Dep't - cited by 79 documents
Decision Content
TZORTZIS V. COUNTY OF LOS ALAMOS, 1989-NMCA-031, 108 N.M. 418, 773 P.2d 363 (Ct. App. 1989)
CONSTANTINE TZORTZIS, Claimant-Appellee,
vs.
COUNTY OF LOS ALAMOS, and the NEW MEXICO SELF-INSURER'S
FUND, Respondents-Appellants
No. 11297
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
1989-NMCA-031, 108 N.M. 418, 773 P.2d 363
April 18, 1989
Appeal from the New Mexico Department of Labor Workers' Compensation Division, Joseph N. Wiltgen, Hearing Officer
COUNSEL
Alexis H. Johnson, Sutin, Thayer & Browne, P.C., Santa Fe, New Mexico, Attorneys for Respondents-Appellants
Matthew L. Chacon, Espanola, New Mexico, Attorney for Claimant-Appellee
OPINION
HARTZ, Judge.
{1} Claimant has moved to dismiss respondents' appeal from a final disposition order of the Workmen's Compensation Administration dated January 18, 1989. Claimant contends that the notice of appeal filed with this court on February 21, 1989, was untimely. We agree.
{2} Respondents rely on NMSA 1978, Section 52-5-8(A) (Repl. Pamp. 1987), which reads: "Any party in interest may, within thirty days of mailing of the final order of the hearing officer, file a notice of appeal with the court of appeals." (Emphasis added.) On the other hand, SCRA 1986, 12-601(A) provides in pertinent part: "Notwithstanding any other provision of law, direct appeals from orders, decisions or actions of boards, commissions, administrative agencies or officials shall be taken by filing a notice of appeal * * * within thirty (30) days from the date of the order, decision or action appealed from." (Emphasis added.) When a statute governing the time for appeal conflicts with a supreme court rule, the rule governs. See American Auto. Ass'n v. State Corp. Comm'n, 102 N.M. 527, 697 P.2d 946 (1985); James v. New Mexico Human Servs. Dep't, Income Support Div., {*419} 106 N.M. 318, 742 P.2d 530 (Ct. App. 1987).
{3} Respondents could have sought an extension of time from this court pursuant to SCRA 1986, 12-201(E)(2) and -601(B), but the time for such a request has expired. See SCRA 1986, 12-201(E)(4). It is therefore ordered that claimant-appellee's motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed.
{4} IT IS SO ORDERED.
THOMAS A. DONNELLY, Judge, RUDY S. APODACA, Judge, concur.