Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,472 documents
Decision Content
A. LUJAN V. P. RIDDLE
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
LAWRENCE ORTEGA AND
ROSALIE ORTEGA,
Plaintiffs,
and
ARABELLA LUJAN, VINCENT LUJAN,
CECILIA GONZALES, AND JOSE ANTONIO
GONZALES,
Interveners-Appellants,
v.
PRISCILLA RIDDLE,
Defendant-Appellee.
NO. 29,180
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
June 10, 2009
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TAOS COUNTY, Abigail
Aragon, District Judge
COUNSEL
The Herrera Firm, P.C., Samuel M. Herrera, Taos, NM, for Appellants
Rudy Martin, Espanola, NM, for Appellee
JUDGES
RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge. WE CONCUR: LINDA M. VANZI, Judge, TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
AUTHOR:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KENNEDY, Judge.
Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
AFFIRMED.
RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge
WE CONCUR:
LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge