Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,410 documents
Decision Content
ARMIJO V. BAUMGARTEL
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
ROBERT A. ARMIJO,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
JOHN BAUMGARTEL,
Defendant-Appellee.
No. 32,323
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
November 29, 2012
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY,
Barbara J. Vigil, District Judge
COUNSEL
J. Ronald Boyd, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellant
Keleher & McLeod, P.A., Robert J. Perovich, Thomas C. Bird, Nathan S. Stimson, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellee
JUDGES
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge. WE CONCUR: JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge, RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. A memorandum in support of proposed summary affirmance was filed on behalf of Appellee.
AFFIRMED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
WE CONCUR:
JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge