Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,435 documents

Decision Content

BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING LP, FKA COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING , LP V. WILSON

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING LP, FKA COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING , LP,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.

PETER G. WILSON and GURU DARSHAN
K.WILSON
Defendants-Appellants,
and
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC
REGISTRATION SYSTEM,
Defendant.

No. 32,710

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

May 15, 2013


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF RIO ARRIBA COUNTY, Sheri A. Raphaleson, District Judge

COUNSEL

Susan C. Little & Associates, P.A., Susan C. Little, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellee

Peter G. Wilson, Guru Darshan K. Wilson, Alcalde, NM, Pro Se Appellants

JUDGES

JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge. WE CONCUR: TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge, J. MILES HANISEE, Judge

AUTHOR: JAMES J. WECHSLER

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WECHSLER, Judge.

{1}       Defendants-Appellants Peter Wilson and Guru Darshan Wilson appeal from the district court’s order denying their motion to dismiss. We issued a calendar notice proposing to dismiss the appeal for lack of a final, appealable order. Plaintiff-Appellee filed a memorandum in support of the proposed disposition, and Defendants-Appellants have not submitted a response to the proposed dismissal. The time for filing a memorandum in opposition having passed, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated in the calendar notice.

{2}       IT IS SO ORDERED.

JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

WE CONCUR:

TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge

J. MILES HANISEE, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.