Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,410 documents

Decision Content

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. V. NICKELL

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO
BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING
LP, f/k/a COUNTRYWIDE HOME
LOANS SERVICING LP,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
JAMES E. NICKELL,
Defendant-Appellant.
and
JAMES E. NICKELL IRREVOCABLE
TRUST and EL CORAZON DE SANTA FE,
Defendants.

No. A-1-CA-36323

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

March 14, 2018


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY, Sarah M. Singleton, District Judge

COUNSEL

Lucinda R. Silva, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellees

James E. Nickell, Santa Fe, NM, Pro Se Appellant

JUDGES

M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge. WE CONCUR: JULIE J. VARGAS, Judge, STEPHEN G. FRENCH, Judge

AUTHOR: M. MONICA ZAMORA

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ZAMORA, Judge.

{1}       Defendant appeals the district court’s adverse judgment in this foreclosure case. We issued a notice of proposed disposition proposing to affirm. Plaintiffs have filed a memorandum in support of the proposed affirmance, but Defendant has not filed a memorandum in opposition and the time allotted for doing so has expired. Rule 12-210(D)(2) NMRA (requiring a memorandum in opposition to be filed within twenty days of service of the notice of proposed disposition). Therefore, we affirm for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition.

{2}       IT IS SO ORDERED.

M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge

WE CONCUR:

JULIE J. VARGAS, Judge

STEPHEN G. FRENCH, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.