Court of Appeals of New Mexico

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

CHARLES BLECHLE, SALLY
BLECHLE, CHERYL KURK,
PEGGY CHESTER, JOSEPH D.
ALBILLAR, and JOHN
D. MOSES,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
SANGRE ROSE, LLC,
JIM VINCENT, and
PATRICIA VINCENT,
Defendants-Appellants.

NO. 30,572

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

March 2, 2011

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY, Raymond Z. Ortiz, District Judge

COUNSEL

Scheuer, Yost & Patterson, Kristofer C. Knutson, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellees

Sangre Rose, LLC, Jim and Patricia Vincent, Santa Fe, NM, Pro Se Appellants

JUDGES

RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge. WE CONCUR: MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge, LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

AUTHOR: RODERICK T. KENNEDY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KENNEDY, Judge.

Appellants (Defendants) appeal from the district court’s “order granting motion to enforce settlement agreement.” [RP 311] Our notice proposed to affirm. Defendants did not file a memorandum in opposition. See Frick v. Veazey, 116 N.M. 246, 247, 861 P.2d 287, 288 (Ct. App. 1993) (recognizing that the failure to file a memorandum in opposition to a calendar notice constitutes acceptance of a proposed disposition). Appellees (Plaintiffs) filed an untimely memorandum supporting our proposed affirmance. For reasons set forth in the notice, we affirm.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge

WE CONCUR:

MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge

LINDA M. VANZI, Judge