Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,435 documents
Decision Content
CARLSON V. CARLSON
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
ALAN CARLSON,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
KIRSTEN CARLSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
NO. 30,758
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
February 16, 2011
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY,
Deborah D. Walker, District Judge
COUNSEL
Border Law Office, P.A., Dean E. Border, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellee
Kirsten Carlson, Edgewood, NM, Pro Se Appellant
JUDGES
RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge. WE CONCUR: MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge, TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge.
AUTHOR:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KENNEDY, Judge.
Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the calendar notice. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge
WE CONCUR:
MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge