Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,472 documents
Citations - New Mexico Appellate Reports
Frick v. Veazey - cited by 97 documents
Decision Content
CHAND V. RIGGS
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
NAREND CHAND,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
JOSEPH RIGGS,
Defendant-Appellee.
No. 33,689
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
November 18, 2014
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY,
Beatrice J. Brickhouse, District Judge
COUNSEL
Narend Chand, Santa Rosa, NM, Pro Se Appellant.
Montgomery & Andrews PA, Margaret A. Graham, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellee.
JUDGES
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge. WE CONCUR: LINDA M. VANZI, Judge, J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
{1} Plaintiff is appealing from a district court order granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. We issued a calendar notice on August 11, 2014, proposing to affirm. Defendant filed a memorandum in support. Plaintiff has not filed a memorandum in opposition, and the time for doing so has expired. See Rule 12-210(D)(3) NMRA. Accordingly, we affirm the district court. See Frick v. Veazey, 1993-NMCA-119, ¶ 2, 116 N.M. 246, 861 P.2d 287 (“Failure to file a memorandum in opposition constitutes acceptance of the disposition proposed in the calendar notice.”).
{2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
WE CONCUR:
LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
J. MILES HANISEE, Judge