Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,472 documents
Decision Content
CONSPIRACY TO THEFT V. LITTLE
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
IN THE MATTER OF THE CONSPIRACY TO THEFT
D/B/A BILLY L. EDWARDS,
Plaintiff-Appellant.
v.
JAMES LITTLE, JR., SCOTT LITTLE, JAY LITTLE,
JEFF ETHRIDGE, MARK EASTERDAY, MRS. JAMES LITTLE, SR.,
JAMES LITTLE WELL DRILLING SERVICE,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 31,467
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
January 4, 2012
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LUNA COUNTY, Daniel
Viramontes, District Judge
COUNSEL
Billy L. Edwards, Deming, NM, Pro se Appellant
James Little, Jr., Scott Little, Jay Little, Jeff Ethridge, Deming, NM, Mark Easterday, Bonnieville, KY, Pro Se Appellees
JUDGES
MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge. WE CONCUR: JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge, RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge
AUTHOR:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BUSTAMANTE, Judge.
Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.
Affirmed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
WE CONCUR:
JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge