Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,472 documents
Decision Content
D. BISHOP V. G. JOHNSON
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
DONALD RAY BISHOP,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ROBERT J. PERRY, Cabinet Secretary,
State of New Mexico, New Mexico Corrections
Department,
Defendant-Appellee,
and
GARY JOHNSON, Governor of the State of
New Mexico, PATRICIA MADRID, Attorney
General of the State of New Mexico,
Defendants.
No. 28,499
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
June 8, 2009
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY, James
A. Hall, District Judge
COUNSEL
Donald Ray Bishop, Hobbs, NM, Pro Se Appellant
N.M. Department of Corrections, Carlos Elizondo, Santa Fe, NM, James R.D. Brewster, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellee
Gary K. King, Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, Deyonna D. Young, Assistant Attorney General, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellee and Defendants
JUDGES
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge. WE CONCUR: CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge, LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
AUTHOR:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the extended time for doing so has expired.
AFFIRMED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
WE CONCUR:
CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge
LINDA M. VANZI, Judge