Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,472 documents
Decision Content
D. PADILLA V. B. TOWNSLEY
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
DON PADILLA and GERI PADILLA,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
BRENT P. TOWNSLEY and JANELL M. TOWNSLEY,
husband and wife, and SPECIALTY BUILDER, INC.,
Defendants-Appellants.
No. 29,223
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
June 16, 2009
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY, Nan
G. Nash, District Judge
COUNSEL
Robert D. Gorman, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellees
Madison, Harbour & Mroz, P.A., Gregory D. Steinman, Rachel A. Bayless, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellants
JUDGES
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge. WE CONCUR: MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge, TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
AUTHOR:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VIGIL, Judge.
Defendants appealed from an order denying their motions in limine, and from the district court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. This Court issued a calendar notice proposing to dismiss the case because it was not an appeal from a final order. In response to our calendar notice, Defendants have given notice to this Court that they do not oppose summary dismissal in this case. Therefore, for the reasons discussed in our calendar notice, we dismiss the appeal.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
WE CONCUR:
MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge