Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,472 documents
Decision Content
DEATON V. FRY
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
HENRY D. DEATON,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SANDRA V. FRY, MOISES GUTIERREZ,
AURORA CALDWELL, and ANY AND
ALL Unknown Claimants of Interest in
the Premises Adverse to Plaintiff,
Defendants-Appellees.
NO. 33,111
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
February 13, 2014
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY, Clay
Campbell, District Judge
COUNSEL
Chappell Law Firm, P.A., Bill Chappell, Jr., Michael Hoeferkamp, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellant
Mark A. Glenn, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellee Fry
Roibal Law Firm PA, Edward J. Roibal, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellee Gutierrez
Narciso Garcia, Jr., Albuquerque, NM, for Appellee Caldwell
JUDGES
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge. WE CONCUR: M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge, J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VIGIL, Judge.
{1} Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
{2} DISMISSED.
{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
WE CONCUR:
M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge
J. MILES HANISEE, Judge