Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,435 documents
Decision Content
DEITCH V. JOHNSON
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
GREG DEITCH and JUDY DEITCH,
Plaintiffs,
v.
SHANE and ANNE JOHNSON,
Defendants/Third-Party
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
RICHARDS FURTH PC & BEN FURTH,
Third-Party
Defendants-Appellants.
NO. 31,089
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
May 31, 2011
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF OTERO COUNTY, James W.
Counts, District Court Judge
COUNSEL
John R. Hakanson, P.C., Miguel Garcia, Alamogordo, NM, for Appellees
The Furth Law Firm, P.A., Ben Furth, Las Cruces, NM, for Appellants
JUDGES
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge. WE CONCUR: CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Chief Judge, RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge
AUTHOR:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VIGIL, Judge.
Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
AFFIRMED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
WE CONCUR:
CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Chief Judge
RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge