Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,435 documents

Decision Content

DEUTSCHE BANK V. ROBINSON-VANN

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL
TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee
under POOLING AND SERVICING
AGREEMENT DATED AS OF
JUNE 1, 2007 SECURITIZED ASSET
BACKED RECEIVABLES LLC
TRUST 2007-BR5,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
SIMONE M. ROBINSON-VANN and
CURTIS VANN,
Defendants-Appellants.

No. 34,947

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

March 7, 2016


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY, Valerie Huling, District Judge

COUNSEL

Rose L. Brand & Associates PC, Eraina Edwards, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellee

JRSPC, LLC, Joshua R. Simms, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellants

JUDGES

J. MILES HANISEE, Judge. WE CONCUR: RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge, TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge

AUTHOR: J. MILES HANISEE

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HANISEE, Judge.

{1}       Defendants-Appellants Simone M. Robinson-Vann and Curtis Vann (Appellants) appeal from the district court’s order denying their motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. [RP 157, 229; DS unnumbered 2] Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. Plaintiff-Appellee has filed a response in support of our notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.

{2}       Accordingly, we affirm.

{3}       IT IS SO ORDERED.

J. MILES HANISEE, Judge

WE CONCUR:

RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge

TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.