Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Espalin v. Espalin

Collection Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Date 09/04/2009
Docket Numbers 29,474
Decision-maker(s) MICHAEL E. VIGIL; CYNTHIA A. FRY; JAMES J. WECHSLER
Opinion Type Unreported Opinions
Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,435 documents

Decision Content

ESPALIN V. ESPALIN

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

IRASEMA ESPALIN,
Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
MARK ESPALIN,
Respondent-Appellant.

No. 29,474

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

September 4, 2009


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY, Mike Murphy, District Judge

COUNSEL

Grace B. Duran, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellee

Keithly & English, P.C., J. Bradley Nichols, Anthony, NM, for Appellant

JUDGES

MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge. WE CONCUR: CYNTHIA A. FRY, Chief Judge, JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

AUTHOR: MICHAEL E. VIGIL

MEMORANDUM OPINION

VIGIL, Judge.

Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge

WE CONCUR:

CYNTHIA A. FRY, Chief Judge

JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.