Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,435 documents
Decision Content
EDWARDS V. NEW MEXICO TAXATION AND REVENUE DEPARTMENT
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
SHAWN AND LINDY EDWARDS,
Protestants-Appellants,
v.
NEW MEXICO TAXATION AND
REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
Respondent-Appellee,
IN THE MATTER OF THE PROTEST
OF SHAWN AND LINDY EDWARDS.
No. 34,395
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
June 26, 2015
APPEAL FROM THE TAXATION & REVENUE DEPARTMENT, Monica
Ontiveros, Hearing Officer
COUNSEL
John Lieuwan & Associates PA, John Lieuwan, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellants
Taxation & Revenue Department, Peter Breen, Special Assistant Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellee
JUDGES
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge. WE CONCUR: MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge, LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VIGIL, Judge.
{1} Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
{2} DISMISSED.
{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge
WE CONCUR:
MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
LINDA M. VANZI, Judge