Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

E. Patterson v. L. Lopresto

Collection Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Date 05/27/2009
Docket Numbers 28,848
Decision-maker(s) RODERICK T. KENNEDY; MICHAEL E. VIGIL; LINDA M. VANZI
Opinion Type Unreported Opinions
Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,435 documents

Decision Content

E PATTERSON V. L LOPRESTO

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

EMILY PATTERSON, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
LEN LOPRESTO, Respondent-Appellant.

Docket No. 28,848

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

May 27, 2009


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY, Mike Murphy, District Judge.

COUNSEL

Francisco Mario Ortiz, Las Cruces, NM, for Appellee.

Bates Law Firm, Lloyd O. Bates, Jr., Las Cruces, NM, for Appellant.

JUDGES

RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge. WE CONCUR: MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge, LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

AUTHOR: RODERICK T. KENNEDY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KENNEDY, Judge.

            Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

            AFFIRMED.

            IT IS SO ORDERED.

RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge

WE CONCUR:

MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge

LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.