Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,435 documents

Decision Content

EKER BROS., INC. V. REHDERS

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

EKER BROTHERS, INC.,
Plaintiff-Counterdefendant/
Appellant,
v.
JOHN G. REHDERS,
GENERAL CONTRACTOR, INC.,
Defendant-Counterclaimant/
Appellee.

NO. 30,163

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

May 17, 2010


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY, Daniel A. Sanchez, District Judge

COUNSEL

Sommer, Udall, Sutin, Hardwick, & Hyatt, P.A., William H. Lazar, Tesuque, NM, Sommer, Udall, Sutin, Hardwick, & Hyatt, P.A., Kurt A. Sommer, Candice Lee, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellant

McClaugherty & Silver, P.C., Joe L. McClaugherty, Tamara R. Safarik, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellee

JUDGES

CYNTHIA A. FRY, Chief Judge. WE CONCUR: JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge, CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge

AUTHOR: CYNTHIA A. FRY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

FRY, Chief Judge.

Appellant appeals the award of costs in this case. We proposed to dismiss the appeal because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. We have received a response from Appellant in which Appellant claims that it was error for the district court to deny Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal, and therefore, we should not dismiss this appeal. As discussed in our opinion in Ekers Brothers, Inc. v. John Gl. Rehders, General Contractor, No. 30,245, we have affirmed the district court’s ruling on Appellant’s motion. Because the motion for extension to file the notice of appeal was properly denied, Appellant’s notice of appeal was untimely.

CONCLUSION

For the reasons discussed in this opinion and in our calendar notice, we dismiss Appellant’s appeal.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CYNTHIA A. FRY, Chief Judge

WE CONCUR:

JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.