Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,410 documents
Decision Content
FASHEH V. LEIGH
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
TAAMER FASHEH,
Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
DANEA LEIGH,
Respondent-Appellee,
and
STATE OF NEW MEXICO ex rel.,
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Intervenor-Appellee.
NO. 35,302
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
February 2, 2017
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TAOS COUNTY, Sarah C.
Backus, District Judge
COUNSEL
Taamer Fasheh, Taos, NM, Pro Se Appellant
Dwight E. Thompson Law Office, PC, Dwight Ewing Thompson, Savannah, GA, for Appellee
Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General, Lila Bird, Special Assistant Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, for Intervenor-Appellee
JUDGES
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge. WE CONCUR: JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge, J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VIGIL, Judge.
{1} Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
{2} REVERSED.
{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
WE CONCUR:
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
J. MILES HANISEE, Judge