Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,435 documents

Decision Content

GAUDET V. DREW

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

DEBORAH E. GAUDET,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
TONI DREW and
RESILIENCY THERAPY,
Defendant-Appellees.

No. A-1-CA-35510

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

October 25, 2017


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY, David K. Thomson, District Judge

COUNSEL

Deborah E. Gaudet, Santa Fe, NM, Pro Se Appellant

Christopher R. Reed, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellee

JUDGES

TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge. WE CONCUR: M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge, HENRY M. BOHNHOFF, Judge

AUTHOR: TIMOTHY L. GARCIA

MEMORANDUM OPINION

GARCIA, Judge.

{1}       Plaintiff Deborah Gaudet (Appellant), a self-represented litigant, appealed from the district court’s order dismissing her complaint with prejudice as a sanction for failure to provide discovery. This Court issued a calendar notice proposing summary affirmance on January 20, 2017. The calendar notice was mailed to the address on file for Ms. Gaudet and was returned by the postal service as “attempted not known.” The Rules of Appellate Procedure require a party proceeding pro se to promptly inform this Court of any change of mailing address. Rule 12-301(D) NMRA (“Counsel for a party, or any party proceeding pro se, shall promptly give notice of any change of mailing address or telephone number by filing a notice with the clerk of the court in each pending cause in which counsel or the party is appearing and by serving the notice upon all other counsel and pro se parties.”). Because the time for filing a response to the calendar notice has expired, we now affirm for the reasons stated in the calendar notice.

{2}       IT IS SO ORDERED.

TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge

WE CONCUR:

M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge

HENRY M. BOHNHOFF, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.