Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,410 documents
Decision Content
GARDNER V. RIVERA
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
WILLIAM GARDNER,
Plaintiff/Counterdefendant-Appellee,
v.
ERIC RIVERA, d/b/a SOUTHWEST
METAL DESIGN,
Defendant/Counterclaimant/Third-Party
Plaintiff/Counterdefendant-Appellant,
and
KATHRYN GARDNER,
Third-Party Defendant/Counterclaimant-
Appellee.
No. A-1-CA-36524
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
January 22, 2018
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANDOVAL COUNTY, John
F. Davis, District Judge
COUNSEL
William Gardner, Bernalillo, NM, Pro se Appellee
Houliston & Weaks, David M. Houliston, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellant
JUDGES
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge. WE CONCUR: M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge, J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VIGIL, Judge.
{1} Defendant appealed the district court’s adverse judgment following a bench trial. We issued a notice of proposed summary disposition, proposing to affirm. Defendant requested an extension of time in which to file a memorandum in opposition, which was granted. However, the requested extension expired on January 5, 2018, over two weeks have passed since the expiration of the requested extension and no memorandum has been received from Defendant. Therefore, for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition, we affirm.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
WE CONCUR:
M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge
J. MILES HANISEE, Judge