Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,435 documents
Decision Content
GONZALES V. NMDWS
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
FLORENCE GONZALES,
Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT
OF WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS
and ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL
SERVICES, LLC,
Respondent-Appellee.
NO. 31,215
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
July 5, 2011
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY,
Barbara J. Vigil, District Judge
COUNSEL
Timothy R. Hasson, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellant
Elizabeth A. Garcia, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellee
JUDGES
LINDA M. VANZI, Judge. WE CONCUR: JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge, JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
AUTHOR:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VANZI, Judge.
Petitioner appealed seeking review of the district court’s order concerning her entitlement to unemployment benefits. In our notice, we proposed to reverse the decision on the basis that it was unsupported by the evidence. The Department has indicated that it does not oppose our proposed disposition. Therefore, for the reasons stated in the calendar notice, we reverse and remand.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
WE CONCUR:
JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge