Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,435 documents

Decision Content

GUTIERREZ V. GARLY

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

ERNEST GUTIERREZ,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
GLORIA GARLY,
Defendant-Appellee.

NO. 30,212

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

January 20, 2011


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF VALENCIA COUNTY, John W. Pope, District Judge

COUNSEL

Ernest Gutierrez, Los Lunas, NM, Pro Se Appellant

Gloria Garly, Los Lunas, NM, Pro Se Appellee

JUDGES

CYNTHIA A. FRY, Chief Judge. WE CONCUR: JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge, MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge

AUTHOR: CYNTHIA A. FRY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

FRY, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff appeals an order dismissing his complaint with prejudice. In this Court’s second notice of proposed summary disposition, we proposed to reverse. Defendant has not filed a memorandum in opposition, and the time to do so has passed. Plaintiff has filed a memorandum in support, with the caveat that he wishes to clarify that his complaint alleged that Plaintiff’s attorney telephoned Defendant and Plaintiff’s daughter, informing them that they should pick up Plaintiff’s equipment and personal belongings from the motel. [RP 8] Because no party opposes our second proposed summary disposition, we reverse for the reasons provided in our second notice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CYNTHIA A. FRY, Chief Judge

WE CONCUR:

JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge

MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.