Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,435 documents

Decision Content

GUILLORY V. N.M. AOC

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

JOSEPH GUILLORY,
Worker-Appellant,
v.

NEW MEXICO ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE
OF THE COURTS and DONA ANA COUNTY
MAGISTRATE COURT ENTITIES OF THE
STATE OF NEW MEXICO, a Self-Insured
Employer,
Employer-Appellee.

No. 32,977

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

January 6, 2014


APPEAL FROM THE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION, Terry S. Kramer, Workers’ Compensation Judge

COUNSEL

Perales Law Group PC, J. Marcos Perales-Piña, Las Cruces, NM, for Appellant

Morgan Lyman, Las Cruces, NM, for Appellee

JUDGES

MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge. WE CONCUR: JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge, LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

AUTHOR: MICHAEL E. VIGIL

MEMORANDUM OPINION

VIGIL, Judge.

{1}       Worker appealed the denial of his claim for workers’ compensation benefits. We proposed to affirm in a calendar notice. Employer filed a memorandum in support of the proposed affirmance; however, Worker has not filed a memorandum in opposition and the time for doing so has expired. Therefore, for the reasons discussed in our calendar notice, we affirm the decision of the worker’s compensation judge in this case.

{2}       IT IS SO ORDERED.

MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge

WE CONCUR:

JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.