Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,435 documents
Citations - New Mexico Appellate Reports
Frick v. Veazey - cited by 97 documents

Decision Content

GREGORY V. MARR

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

ROBERT E. GREGORY,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
TERESA MARR,
Defendant-Appellee.

No. 29,318

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

March 4, 2010


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY, Jerald A. Valentine, District Judge

COUNSEL

Robert E. Gregory, El Paso, TX, Pro Se Appellant

Madison, Harbour & Mroz, P.A., Michael H. Harbour, Sean P. McAfee, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellee

JUDGES

MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge. WE CONCUR: JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge, LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

AUTHOR: MICHAEL E. VIGIL

MEMORANDUM OPINION

VIGIL, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals the order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant. We proposed to affirm in a calendar notice. We have received a memorandum in support from Appellee. Appellant has not filed any opposition to our proposed calendar notice, and the time for doing so has passed. “Failure to file a memorandum in opposition constitutes acceptance of the disposition proposed in the calendar notice.” Frick v. Veazey, 116 N.M. 246, 247, 861 P.2d 287, 288 (Ct. App. 1993). Therefore, for the reasons discussed in our calendar notice, we affirm the decision of the district court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge

WE CONCUR:

JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge

LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.