Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,472 documents
Decision Content
H MORA V. R MORA
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
HEIDI M. MORA,
Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
RAFAEL MORA III, Respondent-Appellee.
Docket No. 28,831
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
March 16, 2009
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANDOVAL COUNTY, John
F. Davis, District Judge.
COUNSEL
Fuentes & Associates PC, Robert R. Fuentes, Rio Rancho, NM, for Appellant.
Tamara Couture, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellee.
JUDGES
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge. WE CONCUR: JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge, CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge
AUTHOR:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
AFFIRMED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
WE CONCUR:
JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge