Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,435 documents
Decision Content
HARDESTY V. STATE FARM
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
EVELYN HARDESTY,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE
INSURANCE COMPANY and EVELYN
JOY COOKSEY,
Defendants-Appellees.
NO. 30,886
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
June 3, 2011
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF EDDY COUNTY, Thomas A.
Rutledge, District Court Judge
COUNSEL
Law Office of Shawn J. Lunsford, Shawn J. Lunsford, Carlsbad, NM, for Appellant
Atwood, Malone, Turner & Sabin, Lee M. Rogers, Jr., Roswell, NM, for Appellees
JUDGES
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge. WE CONCUR: CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge, TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge.
AUTHOR:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VIGIL, Judge.
Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
AFFIRMED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
WE CONCUR:
CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge
TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge