Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,435 documents
Decision Content
HAROLD V. DOHERTY
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
ROBBIN R. HAROLD,
Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
JANET DOHERTY,
Respondent-Appellee.
NO. 34,980
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
November 28, 2016
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF OTERO COUNTY, Angie K.
Schneider, District Judge
COUNSEL
Robbin R. Harold, High Rolls, NM, Pro Se Appellant
John R. Hakanson, Alamogordo, NM, for Appellee
JUDGES
LINDA M. VANZI, Judge. WE CONCUR: TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge, J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VANZI, Judge.
{1} Summary affirmance in part and reversal in part was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance in part and reversal in part has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
{2} AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part as set forth in the calendar notice.
{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
WE CONCUR:
TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
J. MILES HANISEE, Judge