Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,435 documents
Decision Content
HEMBERGER V. GALEY
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
ANNETTE HEMBERGER,
Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
GINIFER GALEY,
Respondent-Appellant.
No. 32,563
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
August 5, 2013
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY,
Raymond Z. Ortiz, District Judge
COUNSEL
Annette Hemberger, Santa Fe, NM, Pro Se Appellee
Knutson Law, P.C., Kristofer C. Knutson, Santa Fe, NM, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellant
JUDGES
LINDA M. VANZI, Judge. WE CONCUR: TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge, J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VANZI, Judge.
{1} Partial summary affirmance and partial summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing partial summary affirmance and partial summary reversal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
{2} We are reversing the district court’s finding that “the relationship of the parties is that of an ‘intimate partner’ as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(32).” [RP 19] We are affirming the district court’s order in all other respects.
{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
WE CONCUR:
TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
J. MILES HANISEE, Judge