Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,472 documents
Decision Content
HOWSE V. ROSWELL SCHOOLS
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
DANA HOWSE,
Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee,
vs.
ROSWELL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT,
Defendant-Appellee,
and
COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICAN, AFL-CIO,
Defendant-Appellee/Cross
Appellant.
NO. 31,772
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
May 18, 2012
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CHAVES COUNTY, Freddie
J. Romero, District Judge
COUNSEL
Martin, Dugan & Martin, Wilfred T. Martin, Jr., Carlsbad, NM, for Appellant
French & Associates, P.C., Stephen G. French, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellee
JUDGES
TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge. WE CONCUR: JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge, MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
AUTHOR:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GARCIA, Judge.
Plaintiff appeals a judgment finding that the school district did not breach the Collective Bargaining Agreement. We proposed to affirm the judgment. The school district has responded with a memorandum in support of our proposal. Plaintiff has filed no response. Therefore, for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition, we affirm the judgment.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
WE CONCUR:
JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge