Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,502 documents
Decision Content
HSD V. E PINO
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
STATE OF NEW MEXICO ex rel. HUMAN SERVICES
DEP’T and MELANIE ESTRADA, Petitioners-Appellees,
v.
EDWARD A. PINO, Respondent-Appellant.
Docket No. 28,710
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
March 26, 2009
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANDOVAL COUNTY, John
F. Davis, District Judge.
COUNSEL
N.M. Human Services Dep’t, Catherine Anne Cameron, Rio Rancho, NM, for Appellee Human Servs. Dep’t.
Peter Everett IV, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellant.
JUDGES
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge. WE CONCUR: JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge, LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
AUTHOR:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
DISMISSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
WE CONCUR:
JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
LINDA M. VANZI, Judge