Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,435 documents
Decision Content
IN RE ESTATE OF CHARLES CROSSLEY
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
IN RE THE ESTATE OF
CHARLES M. CROSSLEY,
Respondent-Appellee,
and
GLEN BAUMGARTNER,
Claimant-Appellant.
NO. 33,015
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
February 13, 2014
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF QUAY, Albert Mitchell,
District Judge
COUNSEL
Donald C. Schutte, Tucumcari, NM, for Appellee
Glen Baumgartner, Las Vegas, NM, Pro Se Appellant
JUDGES
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge. WE CONCUR: CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VIGIL, Judge.
{1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
{2} AFFIRMED.
{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
WE CONCUR:
CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge
TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge