Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,435 documents
Decision Content
INTELLIWORKS V. JANICKE
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
INTELLIWORKS DEVELOPMENT,
INC.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MICHAEL JANICKE,
Defendant-Appellee.
NO. 30,757
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
January 14, 2011
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY, Mary
L. Marlowe, District Judge
COUNSEL
Tal Young P.C., Steven Tal Young, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellant
Silva, Saucedo & Gonzales, P.C., Barbara J. Koenigm, Christopher Saucedo, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellee
JUDGES
RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge. WE CONCUR: JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge, MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
AUTHOR:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KENNEDY, Judge.
Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the calendar notice. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge
WE CONCUR:
JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge