Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,435 documents
Rule Set 1 - Rules of Civil Procedure for the District Courts - cited by 4,506 documents
Citations - New Mexico Appellate Reports
Frick v. Veazey - cited by 97 documents

Decision Content

JANECKA V. JANECKA

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

GERALD WYNN JANECKA,
Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
ELIZABETH LOUISE JANECKA,
Respondent-Appellant.

NO. 33,822

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

April 30, 2015


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANDOVAL COUNTY, John F. Davis, District Judge

COUNSEL

Law Office of Clifton L. Davidson, LLC, Clifton L. Davidson, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellee

L. Helen Bennett, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellant

JUDGES

JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge. WE CONCUR: JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge, TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge

AUTHOR: JAMES J. WECHSLER

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WECHSLER, Judge.

{1}       Respondent appeals from the district court’s order denying her Rule 1-060 NMRA motion for relief from judgment. On March 2, 2015, this Court issued a calendar notice proposing to affirm. Petitioner filed a memorandum in support of this Court’s notice of proposed disposition. Respondent has not filed a memorandum in opposition to this Court’s notice, and the time for doing so has now passed. “Failure to file a memorandum in opposition constitutes acceptance of the disposition proposed in the calendar notice.” Frick v. Veazey, 1993-NMCA-119, ¶ 2, 116 N.M. 246, 861 P.2d 287. This Court therefore affirms the district court’s order for the reasons provided in this Court’s notice of proposed disposition.

{2}       IT IS SO ORDERED.

JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

WE CONCUR:

JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge

TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.