Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,435 documents
Decision Content
J MAILANDER V. NM TAX
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
JOSEPH and KATHY MAILANDER, Petitioners-Appellants,
v.
NEW MEXICO TAXATION and REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
Respondent-Appellee.
Docket No. 28,624
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
March 26, 2009
APPEAL FROM THE N.M. TAXATION AND REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
Margaret B. Alcock, Hearing Officer.
COUNSEL
Law Offices of Daniel A. Dolan, PA, Daniel A. Dolan, Gerald S. O’Donnell, Las Cruces, NM, for Appellants.
N.M. Taxation and Revenue Dep’t, Carolyn A. Wolf, Special Assistant Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellee.
JUDGES
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge. WE CONCUR: RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge, LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
AUTHOR:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
AFFIRMED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
WE CONCUR:
RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge
LINDA M. VANZI, Judge