Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,435 documents
Decision Content
JORDAN V. TEN THOUSAND WAVES
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
SHARON JORDON,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
TEN THOUSAND WAVES, INC.
and DUKE KLAUCK,
Defendants-Appellees.
NO. 30,088
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
April 7, 2010
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY, Daniel
A. Sanchez, District Judge
COUNSEL
Voorhees Law Firm, P.C., Scott F. Voorhees, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellant
Hinkle, Hensley, Shanor & Martin, LLP, Dana Simmons Hardy, William P. Slattery, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellees
JUDGES
CYNTHIA A. FRY, Chief Judge. WE CONCUR: JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge, RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge
AUTHOR:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FRY, Chief Judge.
Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the calendar notice. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
CYNTHIA A. FRY, Chief Judge
WE CONCUR:
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge