Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,435 documents

Decision Content

KIT CARSON ELECT V. ADANG

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

KIT CARSON ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC., a New Mexico Corporation,
and BOBBY ORTEGA, MANUEL MEDINA, FRANCIS CORDOVA,
TOBY MARTINEZ, ARTURO RODARTE, AMBROSE MASCARENAS,
CHRIS DURAN, JERRY SMITH, and BRUCE JASSMAN,
each in his official capacity as a trustee of KIT CARSON ELECTRIC CORP., INC.,
Petitioners-Appellees,
v.
MARIA ADANG and PETER ADANG,
Husband and Wife,
Respondents-Appellants,
and
LINDA R. BENCE, ANDREW D. CHAVEZ, JODE CISNEROS,
DAVID R. GENTH, ERNESTO GONZALES, RITA LARROW,
JEROME LUCERO, DAVID RAEL, and KATHLEEN VANDERBROOK,
Respondents.

NO. 31,469

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

December 22, 2011


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TAOS COUNTY, Sarah C. Backus, District Judge

COUNSEL

Cuddy & McCarthy, LLP, John F. McCarthy, Jr., Santa Fe, NM, for Appellees

Maria and Peter Adang, Ranchos de Taos, NM, Pro Se Appellants

JUDGES

CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge. WE CONCUR: MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge, LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

AUTHOR: CYNTHIA A. FRY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

FRY, Judge.

Appellants Peter and Maria Adang appeal the district court’s order granting a preliminary injunction. [RP 243-45] On October 6, 2011, this Court filed a notice of proposed summary disposition proposing to dismiss the appeal for lack of a final order. Appellants timely filed a memorandum in response to our notice of proposed summary disposition, which we have given due consideration.

For the reasons stated in our notice of proposed summary disposition, we dismiss this appeal for lack of a final appealable order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge

WE CONCUR:

MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge

LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.