Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,472 documents
Decision Content
M. BROWN V. S. MORA
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
MARVIN BROWN,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
STANLEY MOYA, JAMES LOPEZ
DWAYNE SANTISTEVAN, CARLOS
VALDEZ, DAVID VIGIL, RAY TRUJILLO,
T.H. HAMMONTRE, CELESTE V. CASIAS,
MIKE FLORES, KEM HEULSKAMP, and
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 29,190
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
July 2, 2009
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY, Daniel
A. Sanchez, District Judge
COUNSEL
Marvin Brown, Santa Fe, NM, Pro Se Appellant
Jim Brewster, General Counsel, Diana J. Harris, Deputy General Counsel, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellees
JUDGES
RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge. WE CONCUR: CYNTHIA A. FRY, Chief Judge, ROBERT E. ROBLES, Judge
AUTHOR:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KENNEDY, Judge.
Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.
AFFIRMED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge
WE CONCUR:
CYNTHIA A. FRY, Chief Judge
ROBERT E. ROBLES, Judge