Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,472 documents
Decision Content
MARQUEZ V. CALZADA
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
KAREN L. MARQUEZ and
MICHAEL MARQUEZ,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
RICARDO CALZADA, M.D.,
Defendant-Appellee.
No. 33,755
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
September 4, 2014
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF RIO ARRIBA COUNTY,
Matthew Justin Wilson, District Judge
COUNSEL
Tony Scarborough, Santa Fe, NM, Juan Carlos Scarborough, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellants
Chapman and Charlebois, Nicole M. Charlebois, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellee
JUDGES
CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge. WE CONCUR: MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge, J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FRY, Judge.
{1} Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the calendar notice. No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. This case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with our calendar notice.
{2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge
WE CONCUR:
MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
J. MILES HANISEE, Judge